Sources: shelf reading, and my frighteningly vast knowledge of horror films. I do wish we had some K-horror and J-horror like A Tale of Two Sisters, though. Or Epitaph. Or Ju-on. Or Dark Water. Or Audition…
The last few months have been crazy busy, both in Libraryland and personally. The dust has finally settled after moving to a new place in June, last month I visited PA to see family and friends, and after nearly four years of relying on public transit, I have my own set of wheels. Being sans vehicle wasn’t a big deal in Chicago, and even in New Haven I could get around with the buses, walking, and the occasional car rental, but I feel like my world has expanded about 3000%. One of the biggest barriers preventing me from being more professionally active has now been removed. No more futile playing with Google Maps looking for public transit routes that don’t involve a taxi ride, or walking along highways without sidewalks, and no more worrying about returning rentals on time with full tanks of gas! On Friday I went to my first association meeting, which was a great experience – I got to talk / listen to other professionals and see what’s going on outside of my own librarian system, and find out there are lots of opportunities to get involved that I didn’t even know existed. I don’t get to use my web design skills much nowadays, and I’m itching to get out from behind the library walls and go out into communities. Hopefully, it’s going to happen in the next few months.
The branch has been closed on Saturdays for the summer, so Mondays are even crazier than before, with an overflowing DVD cart from four days of an unattended book drop, stacks of children’s books of unknown provenance hanging out on every available surface, summer reading prizes to give out, and an outdoor concert series and piemaking contest in the park right next to the branch. And insatiable young readers, who have been coming out in higher numbers than ever before, seeking out their next book with quite specific criteria in mind, criteria that doesn’t necessarily come in subject headings.
I’ve added some new weapons to my reader’s advisory arsenal lately: AR BookFinder US, which I discovered as a bookmark on a computer at the main branch, the Barnes and Noble website, and even Pinterest. AR BookFinder and Barnes and Noble are great because you can narrow results down by age, something that isn’t built into our catalog. AR BookFinder also has a TON of topics you can choose under their advanced search, such as Adventure-Fantasy and Disabilities-Speech Impaired. The downside to such detailed search criteria? You’ll have to sort through every title in the big series, like Magic Tree House, to get standalone books or smaller series in the genre. Perhaps AR can fix this with a “does not contain” search limiter.
RA of the Day: A few weeks ago we had a super little patron who had just read Close to Famous by Joan Bauer, and she wanted to follow it up with more food fiction. I wasn’t getting many chapter books with the “Baking – Juvenile Fiction” heading in our catalog, so I took to the Internet, where I found Barnes and Noble has categories for food, recipes, agriculture, miscellaneous food fiction, and cooking and baking within their children’s books. Score. Five minutes later, she was happily using the self-checkout to take home Pie by Sarah Weeks.
In my search I also came across a Children’s Food Fiction board on Pinterest. It never even occurred to me that while I’m drooling over cookie recipes and creating my virtual dream home, I’m essentially making pathfinders. This is such a great library tool and it would be so easy to find a book, write a sentence, and BAM! it’s up there for patrons. I’m drooling thinking about how easily I could make a board recommending memoirs and dystopian fiction and old classics and standalone graphic novels. The emphasis on visuals means Pinterest is especially helpful for children’s titles, where the cover design clues you in on the age of the intended audience.
The caveat: to directly link to the library catalog, Pinterest has to be able to pull images from it. It’s not working for our catalog, so that means I’d either have to A) create a usability nightmare with links to Amazon instead of the OPAC and branch availability information that will change as soon as I hit “paste,” or B) abandon Pinterest as a possibility for now. In reality it’s been a struggle finding the time to do any sort of pathfinders, especially with higher priorities like developing our adult health nonfiction collection and weeding history. But one day, though, I’ll get to make them!
A lack of RA subscriptions is something I’ve been dealing with lately. Being at Dominican trained me into just going to Booklist, but 1) that was a college library, and 2) that library served library science students. My library now doesn’t have Booklist or NoveList, so I’ve been falling back on Amazon, Google, and what little knowledge I possess of the prolific popular writers and the new crop of children’s authors that have come onto the scene since I was a pup.
A brief search for some RA tools earlier this week led me to LibraryThing, a neat little site that’s like Goodreads for librarians and hardcore readers dabbling in amateur librarying. I came across them a couple years ago when I used their forums to track down one of the many barely-remembered chapter books from my childhood. Anyway, they have a book suggesting tool that will show you some similar titles. It appears that if you have an account with them, they can tailor recommendations based on your reading history, but the tool doesn’t seem to be working right now. They’ve also got an UnSuggestor that brings up the least likely book to be on the same shelf as your particular book. It’s a fun tool to play with, but it will take me some time to find a practical application for it.
Wikipedia’s article on RA also has some great ideas that I’ll have to explore.
I know just mentioning the name Wikipedia injects horror into some people like it’s an academic Voldemort and it took some flak a few years ago, but let’s be realistic. I’m sure dozens (if not hundreds) of librarians have collaborated to create that article, and thousands more have read it. How many professionals collaborate on the average pathfinder? And then how many users put that average pathfinder to work? How accessible is it? How often is that pathfinder updated? In how many different formats does it exist, and are they updated simultaneously?
There is no other single and free source that will quickly give you hard information like author bibliographies, Caldecott medal winners, and directors’ upcoming films, not to mention non-RA hard info like country capitals, dates and locations for significant events, typical ingredients in regional dishes, and word disambiguations. Sure, Google can collect all that information, but each page you click has a different page layout, flow of text, audience, and motive before even considering the trustworthiness of the source. After all, Google displays their results by popularity, not by merit. More often than not, Wikipedia editors have already combed through those Google results, plucked out the most authoritative ones, and neatly given you the URL in their References or Further Reading section at the end of the article.
So is it lazy to use Wikipedia? Considering the average patrons’ needs, the library system’s limited holdings, and the limited time I can dedicate to exploring those holdings, I’d say in many cases it’s the most practical option. I could comb through Google pages until I find a source with an .edu extension, or I could search the catalog for the possibility of finding a relevant print encyclopedia like I did in Reference class in library school. Had we but world enough and time. So why waste the patron’s time – and the time of other waiting patrons – looking for information that might not be there in the first place at the branch library? I think that’s the more important question for me to ask.